<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>El Tramo | SVNFeed</title>
  <subtitle>Remko Tronçon's Homepage</subtitle>
  <link href="http://el-tramo.be/blog/tag/svnfeed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
  <link href="http://el-tramo.be/"/>
  <updated>2012-05-19T12:29:42+02:00</updated>
  <id>http://el-tramo.be/</id>
  <author>
    <name>Remko Tronçon</name>
    <uri>http://el-tramo.be/about/</uri>
  </author>
  
  <entry>
    <title>SVNFeed: Monitoring Subversion repositories with RSS</title>
    <author>
      <name>Remko Tronçon</name>
      <uri>http://el-tramo.be/about/</uri>
    </author>
    <link href="http://el-tramo.be/blog/svnfeed-01"/>
    <updated>2006-12-04T00:00:00+01:00</updated>
    <id>http://el-tramo.be/blog/svnfeed-01</id>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;If it wasn&amp;rsquo;t clear by now, I&amp;rsquo;m pretty addicted to RSS. Some people disagree, and see RSS as evil because of the extra traffic that active polling of the feeds introduces. To me, it&amp;rsquo;s the easiest way of publishing news, anyone can set up a feed on about any host, and because of the polling nature it allows for easier scripting than other solutions. Besides, with web-based solutions like &lt;a href=&quot;http://google.com/reader&quot;&gt;Google Reader&lt;/a&gt;, the extra traffic can be shared across many users anyway.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The only frustration I am left with is that not every webpage or software package that interests me has an RSS feed. I wrote &lt;a href=&quot;http://el-tramo.be/software/atomail&quot;&gt;AtoMail&lt;/a&gt; to have an RSS feed of projects (or webpages) that have mailinglists instead of RSS feeds. In addition to this script, I just released a script called &lt;a href=&quot;http://el-tramo.be/software/svnfeed&quot;&gt;SVNFeed&lt;/a&gt;, which I use to monitor Subversion activity of projects that don&amp;rsquo;t have an RSS-enabled Subversion Web interface. By monitoring the &lt;tt&gt;tags&lt;/tt&gt; dir of a project, I can even get a more coarse grained granularity of updates, mostly up to the release.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Both scripts might be consolidated in the future, possibly together with even more RSS generation scripts I have lying around ;&amp;ndash;)&lt;/p&gt;
</content>
  </entry>
  
</feed>

